/*! elementor-pro - v3.26.0 - 17-12-2024 */ (()=>{"use strict";class Screenshot extends elementorModules.ViewModule{getDefaultSettings(){return{empty_content_headline:"Empty Content.",crop:{width:1200,height:1500},excluded_external_css_urls:["https://kit-pro.fontawesome.com"],external_images_urls:["https://i.ytimg.com"],timeout:15e3,render_timeout:5e3,timerLabel:null,timer_label:`${ElementorScreenshotConfig.post_id} - timer`,image_placeholder:"",isDebug:elementorCommonConfig.isElementorDebug,isDebugSvg:!1,...ElementorScreenshotConfig}}getDefaultElements(){const e=jQuery(ElementorScreenshotConfig.selector),t=e.find(".elementor-section-wrap > .elementor-section, .elementor > .elementor-section");return{$elementor:e,$sections:t,$firstSection:t.first(),$notElementorElements:elementorCommon.elements.$body.find("> *:not(style, link)").not(e),$head:jQuery("head")}}onInit(){return super.onInit(),this.log("Screenshot init","time"),this.timeoutTimer=setTimeout(this.screenshotFailed.bind(this),this.getSettings("timeout")),this.captureScreenshot()}captureScreenshot(){return this.elements.$elementor.length||(elementorCommon.helpers.consoleWarn("Screenshots: The content of this page is empty, the module will create a fake conent just for this screenshot."),this.createFakeContent()),this.removeUnnecessaryElements(),this.handleIFrames(),this.removeFirstSectionMargin(),this.handleLinks(),this.loadExternalCss(),this.loadExternalImages(),Promise.resolve().then(this.createImage.bind(this)).then(this.createImageElement.bind(this)).then(this.cropCanvas.bind(this)).then(this.save.bind(this)).then(this.screenshotSucceed.bind(this)).catch(this.screenshotFailed.bind(this))}createFakeContent(){this.elements.$elementor=jQuery("
The post ByteDance seeks $1.1 million damages from an intern in an AI breach appeared first on The Tach.
]]>ByteDance explained that due to its internal investigation, the former intern had been dismissed in August 2023. The investigation uncovered malicious interference in a crucial project related to large-scale AI model training. The tampering reportedly disrupted the project, causing delays and wastage of computational resources. ByteDance said that Tian had interfered with code to hinder the progress of the project whose aim was to develop the company’s Artificial Intelligence. The aftermath of the incident slowed the progress of an essential AI language model, therefore the company ended up lagging in the highly competitive field of artificial intelligence.
The hype on Chinese social media has implied that due to the action of Tian, tens of millions of dollars were lost and over 8,000 GPUs were affected. However, ByteDance dismissed these claims as exaggerations. While the actual damage may not have reached such extreme levels, the company’s demand for ByteDance $1.1 million damages reflects the seriousness of the breach.
Before escalating the matter to the courts, ByteDance implemented several disciplinary measures. The company reported the incident to professional ethics organizations, including the Trust and Integrity Enterprise Alliance and the Enterprise Anti-Fraud Alliance. ByteDance also informed Tian’s university about the misconduct, ensuring that appropriate actions were taken at multiple levels.
Despite these measures, Tian consistently denied all allegations during internal investigations, refusing to accept responsibility for the disruption. ByteDance said his refusal to communicate and take responsibility forced them to go to court. To calculate ByteDance’s $1.1 million the company wants to compensate for the losses and ensure ethical conditions for the staff.
This lawsuit comes at a time when ByteDance has been making series progress in the development of artificial intelligence. An AI chatbot called Doubao, which the company began in August 2023, stormed into China’s AI markets soon afterward. By October 2023, Doubao had more than 51 million monthly active users, surpassing rivals such as Baidu’s Wenxiaoyan with 12.5 million and Alibaba-endorsed Kimi with 10 million. Doubao’s success proves ByteDance’s strategy to constant innovation and prominent capacity of producing friendly Artificial Intelligence utilities. The popularity of the bot also shows that the company is one of the leaders in the AI chatbot market, which has become saturated in recent years.
But, as just seen in the case of Tian, such projects remain frail, especially during their development phases. The demand for ByteDance’s $1.1 million damages concerning the proprietary technologies gives a reminder of the need to protect key technologies. As ByteDance has grown its investment in AI technologies, it remains committed to solving issues and protecting its achievements from risks inside and out.
To this end, ByteDance is not the only player looking to take over the global market in artificial intelligence. Other tech firms in China, Alibaba and Meituan are among firms that are putting a lot of investment in artificial intelligence. These companies have their branches in such technological centers as Silicon Valley and intend to attract the best specialists for their creation of new models of AI. But they have tremendous problems, especially because of restrictions on the export of new advanced Nvidia chips from the United States. These chips are crucial for training state-of-art AI models, and the restrictions make ByteDance, and other firms, seek workarounds. Through managing all these challenges competitively, the company was indeed determined to remain relevant in the global market.
The lawsuit against Tian highlights an additional layer of complexity for ByteDance. While external challenges like export restrictions beyond its control, internal threats, such as the one posed by Tian, can mitigated through stricter measures. By seeking ByteDance’s $1.1 million in damages, the company is reinforcing its stance on maintaining security and accountability within its operations.
The story of ByteDance letting go of a former intern who leaked details from a presentation they attended has major security and ethical implications for the technology sector. With corporations around the world spending billions of dollars on artificial intelligence and the like, the chances of internal wrongdoing keep rising. This is because ByteDance’s recent decision to go to court to sue the concerned individuals puts the responsibility where it belongs, as heads of organizations we need to ensure that breaches that compromise proprietary projects dealt with by individuals who have negligently or knowingly contributed to the breach. The demand for ByteDance $1.1 million damages underscores the importance of deterring unethical behavior and protecting valuable resources.
This incident also shows the need for companies to have effective security systems such as strict screening and enhanced surveillance of projects and people with access to highly sensitive information. To eradicate these vulnerabilities, advocates for technological contact must reduce risks and more centers on developing innovations.
The legal action that ByteDance is taking against its one-time intern is a perfect example of the company’s desire to defend its AI inventions and operate within the right parameters. This compensation of $1.1 million represents the extent of the loss that ByteDance suffered due to the leakage, and ByteDance’s willingness to seek its losses. As ByteDance remains a consistent and active investor in the Research and development of artificial intelligence and geographical diversification, this case will best be a reminder of the struggles that come with harnessing bleeding-edge technologies.
In light of this, it establishes a crucible for building accountability and teamwork while managing threats internal and external to the organization. But, making such a move, it is vital to understand that ByteDance is sending a clear message to its staff and the tech industry. The company’s efforts to address the incident and demand ByteDance $1.1 million damages highlight its resolve to navigate challenges and maintain its leadership in the fast-evolving AI industry.
The intern tampered with code, disrupting an AI training project significantly.
ByteDance is seeking 8 million yuan in compensation and a public apology.
The company reported the incident to ethics organizations and the intern’s university.
The case highlights the risks faced in securing proprietary AI projects.
ByteDance aims to secure its AI innovations amid growing competition and internal threats.
The post ByteDance seeks $1.1 million damages from an intern in an AI breach appeared first on The Tach.
]]>